Developing strategies and tools for resilient and sustainable buildings and cities.

[Circularity Week] Most circular strategies fail at the design stage; here's what the research shows

[Circularity Week] Most circular strategies fail at the design stage; here's what the research shows

Circularity isn't failing because of technology. It's failing because of how we define value.

Everyone talks about the circular economy. Very few are confronting its real constraints. After years of research, standards work, and built environment practice, here is what the data shows:

What's actually broken

1.No shared language. Terminology is fragmented across frameworks — "circular" means something different in every room.

2. Time is invisible. We measure performance at year 0, ignoring multi-cycle realities and reference service life.

3. Value retention is not operationalized. We still wait for "end-of-life" to recover value — instead of designing for value from day one.

4. LCA struggles with infinity. How do you assess copper or steel with theoretically infinite reuse cycles? Current tools weren't built for this.

The three loops that matter

🐢Slow it. Longer life, adaptability, and repairability

🎯Narrow it, less material, higher use efficiency

🔄Close it. True reuse and high-quality recycling

"Circularity is a design problem, not a waste problem."

If adaptability, disassembly, and reuse aren't designed in from the start, no regulation, no certification, no recycling system can fix it downstream. The most promising shift today is not recycling. It is the rise of As-a-Service models: products designed to last, be repaired, and be upgraded. Producers are incentivized to care for what they create. Users are gaining flexibility. Value retained, not lost. That's where circularity becomes economically viable — not in the landfill audit. We're pushing through regulations, indicators, and certifications. But we're still missing a consistent, value-based framework across the life cycle — metrics that capture retained value, not just impacts; and design cultures that prioritize reversibility over aesthetics.

💬 A question for the community:

If circularity means keeping value in the system, why are we still designing buildings and products that lose most of their value the moment they are delivered?

Working on circular design, policy, or business models? Share your experience below or reach out. Let's move beyond slogans.

📚 Learn more about our circularity researchhttps://lnkd.in/dhkXJiSi

📚 Learn more about our researchhttps://www.sbd.uliege.be/

💻 Subscribe to my newsletterhttps://lnkd.in/diTVT5eq

🅱️ Bilibili b23.tv/bzjL3bn or 🎬 YouTube https://lnkd.in/erHrfkNf

🌐 Explore previous posts and resourceshttps://www.shadyattia.org

🔗 Follow all my professional links, including WeChat 🟩💬 微信https://lnkd.in/eN3xZhhZ

#CircularEconomy#CircularConstruction#DesignForDisassembly#LifeCycleThinking#SustainableDesign#BuiltEnvironment#NetZero

Subscribe to Shady Attia

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson
Subscribe