Developing strategies and tools for resilient and sustainable buildings and cities.

๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ [Video] How to Review a Scientific Paper (Step-by-Step Guide for Researchers)

๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ [Video] How to Review a Scientific Paper (Step-by-Step Guide for Researchers)

Most researchers are trained to write papers. Very few are formally trained to review them. Yet peer review is one of the most influential mechanisms in academia. A weak review can delay good science. A superficial review can allow poor science to pass. And an unprofessional review can discourage early-career researchers unnecessarily. Here is the uncomfortable reality of peer review today:

๐Ÿ‘‰ Many researchers become reviewers without formal training ๐Ÿ‘‰ Some reviews focus on opinion rather than scientific evidence ๐Ÿ‘‰ Editors increasingly struggle to find qualified and available reviewers ๐Ÿ‘‰ Poorly structured reviews often create confusion instead of clarity

Despite this, peer review remains one of the core pillars of scientific publishing. In this video, I explain how to review a scientific paper systematically, professionally, and ethically.

๐ŸŽฅ Watch the video: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://lnkd.in/dSdkU_fq

๐Ÿ” What many researchers misunderstand about peer review

โ€ข Reviewing is not about rejecting papers โ€ข A reviewer is not a copy editor or a gatekeeper of personal preferences โ€ข Critical comments must be evidence-based and constructive โ€ข The goal is to improve the manuscript and support editorial decision-making

๐ŸŽฏ What this video explains

This episode walks through the full peer review process step by step:

โ€ข how to decide whether to accept or decline a review invitation โ€ข how to assess originality, methodology, and scientific rigor โ€ข how to evaluate each section of a manuscript systematically โ€ข how to identify major versus minor concerns โ€ข how to write a structured and constructive reviewer report โ€ข how to remain professional, ethical, and objective throughout the process

๐Ÿง  Key insight

A good review does not just judge a paper. It improves it.

Strong reviewers help authors strengthen their research, assist editors in making informed decisions, and contribute to the integrity of science itself.

๐Ÿ“š Part of the playlist: Reviewers & Editors: Roles and Responsibilities

๐ŸŽฅ Watch the video: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://lnkd.in/dSdkU_fq

๐Ÿ“š Learn more about our research at SBD Lab โ€“ University of Liรจge

๐Ÿ’ป Subscribe to my newsletter Newsletter

๐Ÿ…ฑ๏ธ Bilibili Channel ๐ŸŽฌ YouTube Channel

๐ŸŒ Explore previous posts and resources at ShadyAttia.org

๐Ÿ”— Follow all my professional links, including WeChat ๐ŸŸฉ๐Ÿ’ฌ ๅพฎไฟก Professional Links Hub

๐Ÿ’ฌ What is the most difficult part of reviewing a scientific paper in your experience?

#PeerReview #AcademicPublishing #ScientificWriting #ResearchIntegrity #PhDlife #PostdocLife #EarlyCareerResearchers #Reviewer #ResearchMethods #Editors #AcademicCareer #ScientificPublishing

Subscribe to Shady Attia

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson
Subscribe